Why do I associate existentialism with the abyss? Here's something of an explanation. It was a philosophy developed at the turn of the century, in reaction to the breakdown of religion as the thing that gave human life meaning. Having no meaning is like staring off the edge of a cliff, into a neverending darkness. The chaos of freedom breeds madness. Why did people always need the external authority of god and religion? Because it allows us not to look at the madness, and live like it doesn't exist. But existentialism is based on that abyss, on facing up to its entirety. The victory lies in overcoming the hopelessness of our lonely race, and to create something from the absurd. Instead of finding meaning in a meaningless universe, we create it when nature never meant it to exist.
And on this issue of 'becoming' - particuarly appeals to me. It's not simply making yourself who you want to be, but it says, there's no one way you are supposed to be. No one way you'll always be. It frees me from destiny.
Questionnaire for everyone who stopped talking to me
5 months ago
1 comment:
Existentialism should be more associated with overcoming the abyss. Soren Kierkegaard, the father of existentialism, posited a leap of faith to traverse this abyss, and in so doing, made existentialism an optimistic philosophy.
Nihilism, should be associated with the abyss. It doesn't believe in a leap, much less with any "meaning". It is fine with the darkness.
Post a Comment